Why did it take an "exhaustive review" to prove that there was NO evidence that Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda were ever in bed together? Yet it only takes the president, V.P., and a handful of neocon hawks to convince America that Iraq and Al Qaeda were the same. Seems trivial to those of us who knew about the facts, like there NEVER was any evidence linking Iraq and Al Qaeda. It was all made up people. Why are we still talking about this? Are we trying to get a new generation to look into things we already know? Seems redundant. Like the "exhaustive review". Priorities people.
The Top Ways To Take Care Of Your Sexual Health In Australia.
-
The only person who can make sure that your sexual health is being looked
after is you and this is something that you can’t pay
The post The Top Ways To ...
6 hours ago
5 comments:
Of course they didn't find any documents linking Saddam Hussein to Osama Bin Laden, Hussein destroyed them all!
Or by destroying them you mean they never exisited then OK.
insane.
If you think the evil one was not in Iraq you are stupid. The Arabs hate freedom.
Who the hell is "the evil one"? Pinhead from Hellraiser? Freddy Kruger?
We get A LOT of anonymous people in here!! Heh
Post a Comment